Oh, to have just ten minutes back from that game.
In that ten minutes (more like 11, but whatever) Colorado scored four times, took what seemed like half of their total shots and pulverized The Hawks in puck possession.
It didn't help that The Hawks were shorthanded most of that time but, hey, you make your bed, right?
Otherwise, The Hawks weren't completely terrible.
Some quick Bits:
* Anton Forsberg was not sharp. Circumstances were not ideal, with the penalty parade and several coverage errors in front of him but, really, 3 of the 5 GA looked soft from my angle. Another poor start will possibly cause a phone to ring in Rockford.
* Nathan MacKinnon simply ran amok. When he decides that's what he wants to do there's not much you can do about that.
This is not how it looks, but it may as well be.
* Poor Coverage and Soft Play - the first GA was a double-shot, with Rutta taking way too much time doing whatever he thought he was doing behind the net, while Forsling stood idly between two COL Players, not covering either of them. On the third COL goal it was a gamble lost by Kempny that led to the Av's breakout, and he and Sharp were thereabouts when MacKinnon tapped the goal in, but as spectators, watching but not actively checking anyone. It didn't help that Seabrook had given up his gap and resorted, yet again, to laying himself out. On the fifth GA, the guy in the most dangerous place on the ice was the only one not being covered. All small mistakes with big consequences.
* Too Many Odd-man Chances - yes, this again. I have no problem with the D joining the rush, and they've been doing that a lot lately but, when the puck inevitably comes back toward The Hawks' zone there is One Guy Back more often than not. It seems to me that the D needs to tone down their offensive adventures and/or The Hawks' forwards need to ensure that someone hangs back to support the lone remaining D-man. As it is there appears to be very little communication in this regard.
* Forsling was hurt in the first period and left the game. Truthfully, The Hawks played better after he left. Coincidence? Let's see.
Crow's lament.
Was there anything GOOD to say about this game? Sure.
* Cody Franson was excellent, full-stop. More, please.
* Crawford, in relief, was very good. He didn't see a lot of action but he did make a tough pair of saves on a shot-rebound combo in the third.
* Shots-for and Possession - all very good. The missing piece element here is turning those shots & chances into goals. That, and not having every single error end up in a goal against.
No comments:
Post a Comment